Confiabilidad y mínimo cambio detectable de la medición de fuerza de rotadores de hombro con handgrip

Paula Carolina Dib; Gimena Paola Cardoso; Mauro Federico Andreu; Silvina García Schustereder; Marisol Alejandra Galloli

doi:10.54789/rs.v1i2.12

Autores/as

Paula Carolina Dib Sanatorio Anchorena San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Gimena Paola Cardoso Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Mauro Federico Andreu Universidad Nacional de la Matanza, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Silvina García Schustereder Hospital Dr. Pedro Fiorito, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Marisol Alejandra Galloli Hospital Dr. Pedro Fiorito, Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54789/rs.v1i2.12

Palabras clave:

reproducibilidad de los resultados, dinamómetro de fuerza muscular, hombro, manguito de los rotadores, fuerza muscular, confiabilidad

Resumen

Objetivos: Determinar la confiabilidad interobservador de la evaluación de la fuerza muscular de rotadores de hombro mediante el dinamómetro handgrip (HG).

Materiales y métodos: Se incluyeron 21 participantes voluntarios sanos. Se analizó la confiabilidad entre la primera y segunda medición realizada por 2 diferentes operadores para la rotación externa e interna, tanto del miembro dominante como del no dominante. Se utilizó el Coeficiente
de Correlación Intraclase (CCI) con sus respectivos intervalos de confianza al 95%. Para determinar el umbral de cambio real en la fuerza de HG cuando diferentes valuadores
registran las mediciones, se calculó el mínimo cambio detectable (MCD)

Resultados: Se observó una excelente confiabilidad entre evaluador para la rotación externa dominante y no dominante (CCI= 0.80 [IC95% 0.58 - 0.92] y CCI 0.80 [IC95%= 0.56 - 0.91], respectivamente). La confiabilidad interevaluador para la rotación interna dominante resultó regular
(CCI: 0.56 [IC95% 0.18 - 0.80] y para la no dominante buena (CCI:0.61 [IC95% 0.25 - 0.82]).

Conclusión: El estudio mostró que la confiabilidad interobservador de la herramienta HG para medir fuerza de hombro es excelente para los rotadores externos y de regular a buena para los rotadores internos.

Citas

Linaker CH, Walker-Bone K. Shoulder disorders and occupation. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2015 Jun;29(3):405-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.04.001

Greving K, Dorrestijn O, Winters JC, Groenhof F, van der Meer K, Stevens M, et al. Incidence, prevalence, and consultation rates of shoulder complaints in general practice. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012 Mar;41(2):150-5. DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2011.605390

Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, et al. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol 2004;33(2):73-81.

Muhafara, G. J., Villarruel, M., Cura, A., Tozzi, W., Vicente, A., Esperón, L. F., Salzberg, S., Soliño, S., Navarro, E., Argento, F., & Policastro, P. (2021). Estudio epidemiológico de afecciones musculoesqueléticas de hombro en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Argentinian Journal of Respiratory & Physical Therapy, 3(2), 13-21

Cools AM, Michener LA. Shoulder pain: can one label satisfy everyone and everything? Br J Sports Med. 20: 16 Mar;51(5):416-417. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096772

Cools AM, Vanderstukken F, Vereecken F, Duprez M, Heyman K, Goethals N, et al. Eccentric and isometric shoulder rotator cuff strength testing using a hand-held dynamometer: reference values for overhead athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3838-3847. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3755-9

Warner JJ, Micheli LJ, Arslanian LE, Kennedy J, Kennedy R. Patterns of flexibility, laxity, and strength in normal shoulders and shoulders with instability and impingement. Am J Sports Med. 1990 Jul-Aug; 18(4):366-75. DOI: 10.1177/036354659001800406

Stark T, Walker B, Phillips JK, Fejer R, Beck R. Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review. PM R 2011; 3:472-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.10.025

Cools AM, De Wilde L, Van Tongel A, Ceyssens C, Ryckewaert R, Cambier DC. Measuring shoulder external and internal rotation strength and range of motion: comprehensive intra-rater and inter-rater reliability study of several testing protocols. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Oct;23(10):1454-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.006

Hayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZL, Murrell GA. Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;11(1):33-9. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.119852

Nagatomi T, Mae T, Nagafuchi T, Yamada SI, Nagai K, Yoneda M. Shoulder manual muscle resistance test cannot fully detect muscle weakness. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017 Jul;25(7):2081-2088. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4380-y

Innes E. Handgrip Strength testing: a review of the literature. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal.1999; 46 (3): 120-140.

Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jun;48(6):661-71

Shoukri MM, Asyali MH, Donner A. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Stat Methods Med Res 2004; 13(4):251-271

Terwee CB, Bot SD, De Boer MR, Van Der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60(1):34–42

Fleiss JL, Reliability of measurement In: The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. 2011. New York: Wiley; 1-32. DOI:10.1002/9781118032923

Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Warner TT, Thompson AJ. What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology? J Neurol. 2012 Dec;259(12):2681-94.

Johansson FR, Skillgate E, Lapauw ML, Clijmans D, Deneulin VP, Palmans T, et al. Measuring Eccentric Strength of the Shoulder External Rotators Using a Handheld Dynamometer: Reliability and Validity. J Athl Train. 2015 Jul;50(7):719-25

Riemann BL, Davies GJ, Ludwig L, Gardenhour H. Hand-held dynamometer testing of the internal and external rotator musculature based on selected positions to establish normative data and unilateral ratios. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010 Dec; 19(8):1175-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.05.021

Horsley I, Herrington L, Hoyle R, Prescott E, Bellamy N. Do changes in hand grip strength correlate with shoulder rotator cuff function? Shoulder Elbow. 2016 Apr;8(2):124-9. DOI: 10.1177/1758573215626103

Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River (New Jersey): Pearson Education Inc.; 2009.

Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19:231–40.

Damron LA, Dearth DJ, Hoffman RL, Clark BC. Quantification of the corticospinal silent period evoked via transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Aug 15;173(1):121-8

Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998 Oct;26(4):217-38

Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med. 1990;20(5):337-40.

Hallgren KA. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23–34.

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin. 1979; 86(2):420–428. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment. 1994; 6(4):284–290. DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307–10.

De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1033-9

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45

Remigio W, Tsai N, Layos L, Chavez M. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the fluid goniometer for measuring active knee flexion in painful knees; correlations do not mean agreement. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):984-988

Chen B, Liu L, Bin Chen L, Cao X, Han P, Wang C, Qi Q. Concurrent Validity and Reliability of a Handheld Dynamometer in Measuring Isometric Shoulder Rotational Strength. J Sport Rehabil. 2021 Jan 19;30(6):965-968. DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2020-0021.

Fieseler G, Molitor T, Irlenbusch L, Delank KS, Laudner KG, Hermassi S, Schwesig R. Intrarater reliability of goniometry and hand-held dynamometry for shoulder and elbow examinations in female team handball athletes and asymptomatic volunteers. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Dec;135(12):1719-26. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2331-6.

Cadogan A, Laslett M, Hing W, McNair P, Williams M. Reliability of a new hand-held dynamometer in measuring shoulder range of motion and strength. Man Ther. 2011 Feb;16(1):97-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2010.05.005